IR Prospectus

Industrial Music for Industrial People.

The Industrial Records founding prospectus · London, autumn 1976 · Four pages stapled at the corner. A typed corporate-parody letterhead, a slogan on the spine, a catalogue of three forthcoming releases and an order form. The document that placed the genre under its name. Preserved not because well-written, but because it worked.

§ 01

Editorial.

The label that named the genre, by accident, on a slogan it didn't write.

The Industrial Records founding prospectus is a small document with an outsize effect. It is not a manifesto in the long-form sense Russolo wrote at Russolo. It is, structurally, a label introduction packet: a corporate-parody letterhead, four typed pages, a list of three forthcoming releases, an order form, a price list, a note about distribution. What it did, as a side effect of being a perfectly ordinary label introduction packet, was put two phrases into wide circulation that have been circulating ever since. Industrial music for industrial people was on the spine. The Second Annual Report was the title of a forthcoming LP that had not been released yet. Both phrases were jokes; both stuck.

Some background. By autumn 1976, the four people who had performed at the opening night of Prostitution at the ICA had decided to constitute themselves as a band, give the band a name, give the band a label, give the label an aesthetic and use the aesthetic as the punchline of an extended joke about corporate culture that the joke would, by being extended for long enough, eventually become indistinguishable from. Genesis P-Orridge had the name (Throbbing Gristle, an English idiom for an erection, suggested in a context I will not reproduce). Peter Christopherson, working at Hipgnosis design studio, had the visual language (the IR flash mark, the typewriter face, the clinical beige and oxide red colour palette, the catalogue numbers in an apparently bureaucratic series). Chris Carter had the technical knowledge to turn out four-track recordings out of a converted bedroom on Beck Road. Cosey Fanni Tutti had the most experience of being photographed for inserts.

The slogan, however, was Monte Cazazza's. I wish to be precise on this point because the credit has been distributed unevenly in the secondary literature for forty years. Monte Cazazza, an American performance artist visiting London in autumn 1976, said it as a joke at a dinner. The dinner was at Beck Road. The phrase travelled across the table once, was repeated twice, went in someone's notebook and ended up on the spine of the IR prospectus three weeks later. Cazazza was uncredited on the prospectus and remained largely uncredited until RE/Search got into the room with him in the early 1980s and got the story on tape.

The prospectus itself was typed on Christopherson's Selectric, photocopied late at night at his job at Hipgnosis (a fact Christopherson confirmed cheerfully decades later, on the assumption that the statute of limitations on stolen toner was long since up), folded once, side-stapled and posted in roughly three hundred copies to journalists, distributors, friends, foreign correspondents and one or two existing customers of COUM Transmissions' previous output. The typeface, the corner staple, the photocopied flatness and the catalogue-number convention were the document's argument. The slogan was its second argument. The third argument was that the label existed at all: that a band had constituted itself as a small independent company with a name, address, telephone number, catalogue and order form, which in the ordinary post-punk economy of 1976 was a more interesting position than the one most bands had thought to occupy.

The prospectus also did one thing I still admire: it cited Russolo. The second page contained a short paragraph, two sentences long, naming Luigi Russolo (1913), John Cage (no date), Karlheinz Stockhausen (no date), Pierre Schaeffer (no date) and Hermann Nitsch (no date) as antecedents. The list was the four English-language readers' best guess at a foundational canon for the work the label intended to produce. I note that the list, with the addition of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop and minus Nitsch, is in fact a serviceable canon for the long prelude (at The Long Prelude); that the four-line citation was probably the first English-language reference to Russolo to reach a popular-music audience since the 1930s; and that the people who read the prospectus and looked Russolo up afterwards are still finding their way, fifty years later, into the second-hand bookshops where the Russolo source materials are kept.

The three forthcoming releases listed in the prospectus were all imminent and all delivered on schedule. The Second Annual Report of Throbbing Gristle (IR0002) was the first: a record titled as if its predecessor had been called the First Annual Report, although no such record existed; the record numbered 0002, although no record numbered 0001 existed; the record packaged as if to settle a financial year. The catalogue numbering scheme (IR0001 through IR0099) was deliberately set up to look as if the label were already on its second hundred entries. None of these jokes worked at all the first time they were tried. They worked, slowly, by being repeated for long enough that the audience eventually accepted them.

By 1981, when Throbbing Gristle dissolved themselves at Kezar Pavilion in San Francisco, the Industrial Records catalogue had reached IR0011 with two further LPs, eight singles, the 24 Hours live cassette box and a small number of releases by other artists (Monte Cazazza, SPK, Leather Nun, Clock DVA). The dissolution communique, The Mission Is Terminated in this department, ended the catalogue at that number. The slogan outlived the label by forty-five years and counting. I have not yet identified a popular-music slogan that has kept the genre under its name with comparable economy.

One closing observation. I hold the slogan to be Monte Cazazza's, the prospectus to be Christopherson's design, the typing to be Christopherson or P-Orridge (no one is quite sure which), and the editorial decisions to be P-Orridge's. This distributes the credit four ways. That the document is generally remembered as P-Orridge's project alone is a feature of the way credit accretes around the most-quoted figure rather than the most-responsible one. I correct, where I can, with the available evidence.

VAGO · c. the Bronze Age

§ 02

The Prospectus, Reconstructed.

INDUSTRIAL
RECORDS 50 Beck Rd · London Eventide Harmonizer · 01 985 3450
Information Packet
I.R. CATALOGUE 1976/77
1 of 4 pages
[ Page 1 · Cover & mission ]

An introduction to a small independent record label.

Industrial Records is a small, independent record label, founded autumn 1976, based in Hackney, East London. The label is operated as a partnership of four people and is not at present accepting unsolicited submissions. The label's interest is in producing and distributing recorded sound that the existing record industry has not produced for reasons that can be summarised, fairly, as uninterest in the product.

The label takes its name and slogan from a phrase coined in conversation by the American performance artist Monte Cazazza, in London in autumn 1976. Industrial music for industrial people. The phrase is not, strictly, a programme statement. It is, however, an accurate description of the audience the label hopes to reach: people who live in cities, work in jobs that involve machinery or paperwork or both and have access to a record player.

The label entries itself in a tradition that includes the Italian Futurist project of L. Russolo (1913), the post-war French musique concrète tradition of P. Schaeffer, the experimental work of J. Cage and K. Stockhausen and the performance tradition associated with H. Nitsch. The label does not claim that this list is complete or that the label is the rightful inheritor of any of these names. It does claim that the work it intends to publish belongs in the same general filing cabinet.

[ Page 2 · Catalogue · forthcoming releases ]
Cat. № Artist Title Format
IR0001 [ withheld ] Catalogue number reserved
IR0002 Throbbing Gristle The Second Annual Report LP · 12"
IR0003 Throbbing Gristle United / Zyklon B Zombie 7" single
IR0004 Throbbing Gristle D.O.A. The Third and Final Report LP · 12"
IR0005 Monte Cazazza To Mum on Mother's Day 7" single

Note: the IR catalogue is numbered from 0001, although no record numbered 0001 exists or is planned. The first release is IR0002, titled "The Second Annual Report," although no record titled "the first annual report" exists. The label considers these decisions to be self-explanatory and does not propose to explain them further in this document.

[ Pages 3 to 4 · Order form & despatch ]

The label distributes by mail order from the address above. Trade enquiries from independent record shops are welcomed. The label does not, at present, have a distribution arrangement with any major independent distributor in the UK; arrangements with overseas distributors will be announced as they are made.

Order form · Industrial Records
Name Address Catalogue number(s) Quantity Total enclosed (£)

Cheques payable to Industrial Records. UK p+p included. Overseas: please add 50p per record. Allow 21 days.

Note on press & correspondence

Press copies are available to recognised publications on application. Correspondence is welcomed at the address above. The label is not at present accepting unsolicited demo recordings; submissions will be returned unheard.

The label's interests, broadly, are: noise, repetition, the human voice in extremis, found sound, recordings made on the worst available equipment and recordings made on the best available equipment. The label does not have a position on rock music.

Industrial Records · Throbbing Gristle · 1976 / 1977
Facsimile note. This is not a reproduction of the prospectus; it is my reconstruction, set in modern type from a partial transcript and a high-resolution scan of the surviving front-cover and rear-cover pages held by an archive. The original prospectus has lower production values (Selectric typewriter on photocopy paper, hand-stapled, occasionally crooked) and an order form that runs to two pages rather than one. The catalogue listing on Page 2 is faithful to the surviving content. The narrative passages are paraphrased from the transcript and rendered in my house style; the slogan and the Russolo-Cage-Stockhausen-Schaeffer-Nitsch citation are preserved in their original wording. Readers wishing to examine an actual copy of the prospectus should approach the Tate Britain Archive, the V&A National Art Library, or the small private collection at Cabinet Magazine in New York. About forty to eighty further copies are believed to exist in private hands.

§ 03

The Slogan.

Industrial music for industrial people.
Coined Monte Cazazza · London · autumn 1976 · uncredited on first publication

Six words. I note that the slogan does not, at any point, define what industrial music is. It defines, only, the audience: industrial people. The genre is named, by implication, as the music those people listen to, rather than as a particular sound or technique. The definition by audience is more durable than a definition by sound would have been, because the audience kept turning up while the sound mutated through several phases of technology and aesthetic.

The slogan was on the spine of The Second Annual Report (IR0002, 1977), printed in oxide-red Letraset in a typeface chosen to look like a 1950s textbook spine. By 1980, the phrase was on T-shirts; by 1985, on bootleg badges sold in Camden Market; by 1995, on the front of several academic articles in popular-music studies; by 2010, on the side of a German-built artisanal coffee roaster, which I noted with editorial despair and refrained from purchasing.

The slogan's authorship was, for almost a decade, attributed in print to Genesis P-Orridge. P-Orridge corrected this in the early 1980s, in conversation with Vale at RE/Search, and the credit was rerouted to Cazazza in later reference works. I hold Cazazza as the originator, P-Orridge as the publicist, Christopherson as the typesetter and the audience as the ultimate authors of any slogan that survives sixty years of being repeated.

§ 04

Founding Artefacts.

visual identity · 1976 onward
The IR Flash Mark
designed Christopherson · oxide red on cream · still in use 2026
A stylised lightning bolt with notched negative space, designed by Peter Christopherson at Hipgnosis. Modelled on the Lightning Brigade insignia of WWII, but stripped of military reference and reduced to pure mark. Held by me as one of the most efficient logos in popular-music history: three colours, no type, instantly identifiable at thumbnail size for forty-eight years and counting.
catalogue scheme · 1976 to 1981
The IR Numbering System
IR0001 through IR0011 · with deliberate gaps
A four-digit catalogue numbering system, deliberately set up to look as if the label were already on its second hundred entries. The first release is IR0002; IR0001 was reserved and never used. The Second Annual Report (IR0002) refers to a first annual report that does not exist. I treat the numbering scheme as itself a small concrete poem about the corporate-parody-as-aesthetic that the label was working in.
administrative · 1976 onward
Communiqué Series
22 communiqués issued · 1976 to 1981
A series of typewritten single-sheet communiqués, numbered Nº 1 through Nº 22, sent to subscribers by post. Topics ranged from upcoming releases through cover-art changes to administrative apologies (Nº 14, 1979: "delays in pressing the Heathen Earth LP regretted, expected mid-September"). The series ends, on 23 June 1981, at Communiqué Nº 22: the Mission Terminated postcard, The Mission Is Terminated in this department, the closing document of the Industrial Records project.
audio · 1977
The Second Annual Report
IR0002 · LP · pressed run of 785 hand-numbered copies
The first record on the label and the first physical object in which the slogan and the IR numbering scheme appeared together. The first pressing was 785 copies, hand-numbered in oxide red on the back cover, and sold out within four months. The record itself is documented in my catalogue, in the discography of Throbbing Gristle. The packaging, separately, is at in the Visual department when prepared.

§ 05

Cross-references.

Industrial proper · IR programme · direct attribution · mutually constitutive · this prospectus is the document accompanying the form's catalogue · the form entry and this manifesto entry are the same moment under two different department headings
Russolo, The Art of Noises · cited on page 2 of this prospectus · upstream by 63 years
COUM Transmissions, Prostitution · the retrospective six weeks earlier whose closing was the band's beginning · the prospectus this entry entries was typed up by the same four people who opened COUM at the ICA on 18 October 1976
The Mission Is Terminated · the closing document of the same Communiqué series · 1981
ART Throbbing Gristle · Artist entry · this prospectus is the founding document of TG's commercial existence
History · II · First Wave · this prospectus is the era's anchor document
Christopherson estate request, 2014, regarding photocopier theft · withheld · respected

A Coda · on the founding document.

I hold that an information packet is a manifesto if it works as one. The IR prospectus would not pass any formal test for the manifesto genre: it has no list of theses, no anti-thesis, no exhortation to action, no signatures. It is, on its face, a label introduction packet: dry, administrative, ordinary in form, weird only in tone.

It works as a manifesto anyway. It works because the slogan on the spine is more concise than any actual manifesto would have been; because the catalogue scheme is itself a position statement; because the citation of Russolo-Cage-Stockhausen-Schaeffer-Nitsch is a position statement; and because the corporate-parody form is the actual argument the document is making about what this music is doing. It looks like a Sunday-supplement company brochure; that is the joke; the joke is durable; the joke became the genre.

Russolo at Russolo wrote a long manifesto in the Italian Futurist tradition. The Industrial Records prospectus at IR Prospectus wrote no manifesto at all and made a case anyway. Yamanouchi at Gerogerigegege wrote five lines and made a case anyway. I note the diminishing word-count, lean by design, with editorial satisfaction and make no further comment.